In an email I received recently I have been asked what five things would change from the current educational system. Yes, just like it sounds. Without any possibility of fleeing from the response. Go, five and, for being a good number, it sure works for someone to get an idea of where I think the change should go. The truth is that it becomes complex to reduce it to five but, honestly, go further than the previous in a personal opinion, very marked by my way of understanding Education and the professional task as a teacher I perform in the system, could get bored to the staff. So let’s get to it. To throw myself at the pool and say, with all the bias that implies not being able to demonstrate, at the scientific level, nothing that I am proposing.
First of all, I am clear that there can be no question of changes involving a large financial outlay. It is not because there is no money and the same goes to other less necessary items (well, everyone has their idea about what is necessary or not), but if you make proposals is because they may have a little viability. If not, it is better to keep silent and start writing a book of educational utopias. Well, it is not necessary because, apparently, if one analyzes many of the books that are publishing some see that, beyond doing marketing of certain educational centers or sell smoke, little possibility of translation to the classroom possess.
You may also like to read : The Importance Of Visual Learning
Already, you see that I have rewound. Yes now…
The first action I would take is to stop grouping the students by physiological age from ESO and to allow a modular system that would allow, being advised by the teachers and their “mentors” (now I will enter into that figure) that Could be configured a personalized learning system that allowed that, after the years of schooling, everyone could reach the same place. No, it’s nothing utopian. There is no need to be a Taliban of age groupings. Why not allow learning to be personalized and remove the first to fourth ESO name to reconvert it into modules that must be completed and overcome regardless of the age of the student? By the way, I think some of you already intuit what I mean when I talk about “mentors”. You are right, Instead of group tutorials, when the courses disappear – not the modules, subjects or subjects -, a tutoring system should be configured so that the number of students in the center is evenly distributed among all the teachers in the center. Accompany them from the time they enter until they leave. Yes, always to them. Smaller groups that allow, among other things, better contact between families and mentor and, of course, serve as a reference and help students in their academic problems. A tutoring system should be set up so that the number of students in the center is equitably distributed among all the teachers in the center and accompany them from the time they enter until they leave. Yes, always to them. Smaller groups that allow, among other things, better contact between families and mentor and, of course, serve as a reference and help students in their academic problems. A tutoring system should be set up so that the number of students in the center is equitably distributed among all the teachers in the center and accompany them from the time they enter until they leave. Yes, always to them. Smaller groups that allow, among other things, better contact between families and mentor and, of course, serve as a reference and help students in their academic problems.
Pity, I’ve been left with only three more things to propose seeing that I will have many in the inkwell. Well, let’s go with the other one. It is a bit more conflictive because surely there is going to be someone who will find his but the same. It would raise the creation of specific centers of Vocational Training well endowed, with specific faculty and, with its own norms of operation. Already, I know that some will say that it is to go back to the past or you call me traditionalist but, do you honestly believe that the best thing to give a quality FP is to mix those students in the same centers as students of ESO and baccalaureate? No, I do not enter the change of ESO or baccalaureate – beyond maybe, and here I’m not clear and so I do not make the proposal for change,
No, I will not go into the reduction of ratios because, in principle, to stop grouping the students by physiological age already lets you intuit. Of course, yes I will enter the model of teacher training. Yes, I would totally change it; I would eliminate the counseling and bring the whole faculty back into the classroom. Having done this, I would propose a personalized training model for each of the teachers and, within the budgetary possibilities, would allow him to choose the place of training in what he needed to improve his teaching praxis. We are throwing a lot of money into training that does not serve as an inside door and, honestly, general education does little. Why not go one step further and allow each teacher to choose their training, be given the money for it and be forced to, Beyond performing a certain number of training from time to time, be evaluated its translation to the classroom ? Of course, the issue of eliminating counseling would make it reversible because I do believe that there should be a place where teachers could exchange experiences, although I’m not sure if the counseling model is the right one. Perhaps a system of training advisers would be better passed through the centers, analyzing needs and helping teachers to manage their needs. Much more productive, always in my opinion, than not what exists now. The topic of the elimination of counseling would make it reversible because I do believe that there should be a place where teachers could exchange experiences although I am not clear if the model of counseling is the most appropriate. Perhaps a system of training advisers would be better passed through the centers, analyzing needs and helping teachers to manage their needs. Much more productive, always in my opinion, than not what exists now. The topic of the elimination of counseling would make it reversible because I do believe that there should be a place where teachers could exchange experiences although I am not clear if the model of counseling is the most appropriate. Perhaps a system of training advisers would be better passed through the centers, analyzing needs and helping teachers to manage their needs. Much more productive, always in my opinion, than not what exists now.
You may also like to read : Learn How To Create Courses Or Use In Mobile Phones
Finally one last thing in sight of what is currently happening in the political arena, which manages education, in reference to those who are releasing it for the advisors. It would force them to be active teachers and would allow them at most to be a certain number of years out of the classroom. No, it makes no sense to have people who have never stepped into the classroom advising politicians to make decisions on educational issues. No, it’s not a trivial matter.
Sure I have left many things in the ink but the number does not give for more. By the way, this article is one of those that I would like you to comment on (either here or by social networks) because I believe that, surely, you also have your five things that you would change in the current educational system.
